Political interference blocked rice and maize delivery – Agric Ministry to PAC

The Ministry of Food and Agriculture has told Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee that political interference prevented a contracted firm from distributing rice and maize nationwide.

During proceedings reviewing the Auditor-General’s Special Audit Report on outstanding government claims, officials explained that Rans Logistics, hired to transport and deliver emergency supplies, was denied access to the supplier’s warehouse.

“We had inspected the rice at the supplier’s warehouse and taken possession of it, but when the transporter went to lift the commodities, they were physically prevented by persons who were not part of the contract,” the Ministry stated.

The disruption reportedly occurred shortly after elections, when individuals described as “party people” allegedly took control of the warehouse. Despite funds being released for the exercise, the contractor had to suspend operations, later refunding GH¢19.1 million representing unutilised funds.

The PAC hearing saw tensions rise over the “party people” claim. MP for Ketu North, Eric Edem Agbana, demanded the former Procurement Officer clarify which political group was referenced.

“We beg you, Mr Chairman, she made a categorical statement and is in a position to explain herself. Which party people? Are you saying individuals took over the supplier’s premises, leading to a GH¢19 million shortfall?” Mr. Agbana asked.

Deputy Minister John Dumelo intervened, prompting PAC Ranking Member Samuel Atta-Mills to respond sharply: “Are you trying to suggest I am not doing my job well? The Minister has spoken and indicated that it was Ghanaians who went there,” he said.

PAC Chairperson Abena Osei Asare called for calm. “I think we should end it here. You are not more partisan than your Ranking Member who is managing proceedings. Respectfully,” she said.

Mr. Agbana rejected claims of partisanship, insisting his questions were procedural. “Madam Chair, respectfully, I take strong exception to that statement. Parliament is a House of records. My question was to ensure clarity on what was meant by ‘party people’,” he explained.

The Committee raised concerns that post-election political interference could undermine the effective implementation of critical government programmes, threatening accountability and transparency.